Author: Connie Wilson Page 2 of 169

Biographical Information

Connie (Corcoran) Wilson graduated from the University of Iowa and earned a Master’s degree from Western Illinois University, with additional study at Northern Illinois, the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Chicago. She taught writing at six Iowa/Illinois colleges and wrote for five newspapers and 7 blogs. Her stories and interviews have appeared online and in print and her work has won prizes from “Whim’s Place Flash Fiction," “Writer’s Digest” (Screenplay), E-Lit award for 3 works, Illinois Women's Press Association Silver Feather awards, Pinnacle award (NABE) and recommendations for the Bram Stoker award. She is the author of 4 nonfiction published books, 4 short story collections, 1 novel and there are 2 novels ready for publication (the trilogy beginning with "The Color of Evil.") She reviewed film and books for the Quad City Times (Davenport, Iowa) for 12 years and wrote humor columns and conducted interviews for the (Moline, Illinois) Daily Dispatch.

What The Bill Will Do: What We Need To Do

By Connie Wilson

On July 5, 2025

In Editorial, Education, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics

(By Patricia Hoffman, with updates from the blog.)

For the people that didn’t have the time to read the entire bill that Trump just signed..here’s the worst of the worst…

UNTIL IT HITS HOME, TRUMP VOTERS WILL KEEP LOOKING AWAY—

Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” isn’t a budget—it’s Project 2025 turned into law. A blueprint for authoritarian rule disguised as fiscal policy.

And the damage? It’s about to hit YOU.

Here’s how it’s coming for YOU:

WHEN THE STORM HITS & NO ONE COMES

Sec. 80307–80309: Slashes climate resilience + FEMA funds

Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will leave your town in ruins—and there’ll be no help coming. Just ask North Carolina. Recently Trump’s old Press Secretary, now Governor of Arkansas, Sarah Huckabee, called to ask for help for her storm-damaged state. Guess how responsive this administration would be to a blue state?

WHEN YOUR MEDICARE IS GONE

Sec. 44141 + 44122 + 44131: Medicaid work requirements + limits + blue state penalties

Can’t prove you worked enough hours? Say goodbye to coverage. Missed the paperwork? No backpay. Live in a blue state? Tough luck. The goal, according to a NY Times analysis, is to make the paperwork so difficult that it is nearly impossible to claim aid, even when it the applicant needs it and deserves it. “Death by a thousand paper cuts.”

WHEN YOUR MEDICARE, MEDICAID, & VETERANS CARE DISAPPEAR

Sections 44141, 44122, 44131, 44125

Work requirements kick seniors off Medicaid.

Blue states lose funding for expanded coverage.

Gender-affirming care banned—even for veterans who served this country.

Retroactive coverage is eliminated—so if you got sick before paperwork cleared, too bad.

And veterans? They’ll face longer wait times, fewer providers, and reduced support for mental health, PTSD, and service-related conditions—while Trump brags about giving billions to his golf resorts.

WHEN YOU CAN’T AFFORD A DOCTOR

Sec. 44110 + 44125: Cuts all care for undocumented people + bans gender-affirming care

Your local hospital shuts down because funding dries up. You get in line—and find out your service doesn’t exist anymore.

WHEN YOUR GROCERY BILL DOUBLES

Trump tariffs + SNAP (Food Stamp) cuts in Sec. 10008, 10012

Your produce costs more, your gas costs more, and your neighbor just got kicked off food assistance at age 64. RiverBend Food Bank in the Quad Cities is already on record issuing warnings about their concern(s). You’ll have the GOP to thank for not being able to provide food to the needy in the richest country on Earth.

WHEN YOUR PHARMACY, POST OFFICE, OR BANK VANISHES

Budget austerity + deregulation (Sec. 50002, 50003)

Demonstrators in Davenport protested both the autocratic behavior of DJT and his ICE raids.

The institutions holding your small town together disappear—and with them, your access to medicine, checks, and mail. During DJT 1.0 there was already an assault on the USPO because of Trump’s appointee to top administrative positions, who had stakes in the private delivery of mail. Good luck on keeping Benjamin Franklin’s legacy to us alive and well. And this doesn’t even factor in the many small businesses that can’t make plans from week to week because of Trump’s on-again/off-again tariff obsession or because they are Latino and can no longer operate their food truck or small business amongst all the chaos that the King of Chaos hath wrought.

WHEN YOU LOSE YOUR JOB

Sec. 90004–90006: Civil service purge + pension gutting

You’re fired to make room for a Trump loyalist—and your pension just got slashed while you weren’t looking.

WHEN YOUR DAUGHTER’S SCHOOL TEACHES OBEDIENCE, NOT MATH

Sec. 30061 + DEI bans. This is a technique right out of the most recent “rules” handed down to Russian schools by Vladimir Putin. (See “Mr. Nobody Against Putin” documentary).

A still from Mr. Nobody Against Putin by David Borestein and Pavel Talankin, an official selection of the 2025 Sundance Film Festival. Courtesy of Sundance Institute | photo by Pavel Talankin

Education turns into indoctrination. The path to college narrows. DEI is gone. If she’s not a legacy or male, she’s left behind. Women’s rights, fought for since the 70s, are already disappearing, as access to abortion has been rescinded and now the GOP evangelical supporters will be focusing on eliminating access to the morning after pill. Your job as a female (J.D. Vance and Elon Musk would approve) is to return to the fifties, when a woman’s place was in the kitchen and popping out babies to raise the country’s birth rate. Back to when the “good” jobs were reserved for males only. I remember that era well. No females need apply to join the ranks of professional occupations. It was fine to be a secretary, a hairdresser, a teacher, a nurse, but don’t apply to medical school, law school or engineering school.

WHEN BOOKS DISAPPEAR FROM YOUR LIBRARY (if they haven’t already)

Federal anti-“woke” regulation in play

The books your kid loves? Gone. History? Whitewashed. And no, it’s not up for debate. If DJT says that it’s the Gulf of America, get with the program. If DJT says he really won the election of 2020, be prepared to say “Yes, Sir” or STFU. Rewrite the insurrection at the Capitol as “warriors”for Trump instead of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.

January 6th: Trump-inspired invasion of the Capitol. All pardoned, with no cogent plan to separate those who had attacked police officers and headed militia organizations.

WHEN BLACKOUTS HIT & THE GRID FAILS

Sec. 42108–42301: Repeals environmental safeguards + Clean Air Act

Wildfires, rolling blackouts, and air so dirty your kid needs an inhaler. All so fossil fuel execs can cash out faster. Trump is even attempting to bring back coal, which he remembers from his youth. While China is making progress on their emissions, the U.S. is moving backwards, intentionally. Climate change is just a hoax for the GOP. Don’t worry about the steadily increasing incredible heat or the much-higher-than-normal hurricanes and tornadoes. Just agree with your Dear Leader.

WHEN YOUR 401(K) VANISHES

Market panic from deregulation + chaos economics

Trump’s chaos spooks Wall Street. Your retirement evaporates. No more dream home—just dreams deferred.

Adam Kinzinger.

WHEN YOUR SON IS SENT TO WAR

Sec. 20001: Indo-Pacific military escalation

Trump fans the flames abroad, then demands your kid carry the torch. No plan, no diplomacy—just body bags. If the planning and leadership for armed conflict is as slipshod as the recent Yemen SNAFU (that put the Editor of the ‘Atlantic” in the loop) or DOGE, good luck to us all.

WHEN LGBTQ+ KIDS HAVE NOWHERE LEFT TO GO

Sec. 44125: Strips healthcare + protections. Phone banks for suicidal LGBTQ kids are already gone.

Your gay nephew? Your trans friend? Denied care, expelled from school, forced into the shadows. Gays and women should “learn their place.” This bill makes “Don’t ask; don’t tell” look absolutely progressive.

WHEN BILLIONAIRES GET TAX CUTS, YOU GET THE BILL

Trump’s bill eliminates the tanning bed tax, free IRS filing, and expands MAGA-branded savings accounts while cutting food, healthcare, and energy support for working families.

They’re redistributing wealth upward—and branding it as patriotism.

Meanwhile, you can’t file your taxes without paying TurboTax.

WHEN PARENTS CAN’T AFFORD CHILDCARE OR PRE-K

Missing Now: The bill slashed child tax credits and cut funding for childcare—directly impacting working parents.

You’re expected to work more while getting less—and pay more for someone else to watch your kids.

Universal Pre-K? Gone. Raising smart, independent thinkers isn’t part of their plan. The less critical thinking the GOP is capable of doing, the better. Trump chose the Republican party to be his standard bearer (despite years of contributing to Dems) because he knew they’d be easier to con. And he was right.

WHEN YOUR COMMUNITY CENTER CLOSES & PARKS FALL APART OR ARE SOLD OFF

Elon Musk

Sections 41009, 80301–80309: Guts historic preservation, climate justice, national park maintenance, and local community block grants.

No summer rec program. No park repairs. No local arts grants. Small towns and underserved communities will be hollowed out.

WHEN THE GOVERNMENT ISN’T WORKING—BECAUSE TRUMP & MUSK FIRED EVERYONE

Sections 90004–90006 (Schedule F): Guts civil service protections and allows mass firings.

RFK, Jr.

Experienced public health experts, FEMA coordinators, and environmental scientists—replaced by political loyalists who will say “yes” to anything. Non-medical Health & Human Services leader Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is already sowing distrust of the medical experts. During Congressional hearings it was necessary to explain some of the medical terms to the people in charge, because they have no background in medicine or science. Already debunked theories about ADD and ADHD being caused by vaccines that have saved millions of lives now cause things like the recent measles epidemic that began in Texas. Do you remember the polio vaccine? The Department’s advice and public pronouncements about vaccines (etc.) are so unreliable and off-the-mark that one of the nation’s leading experts in the field, Dr. Michael Osterholm, has formed a group to put out knowledgeable advice to the unsuspecting public. Sowing distrust in public institutions is perfect for a leader who may well be a Russian asset, as it cuts deep. We become the laughingstock of the educated science-based world as we stumble from crisis to crisis led by erroneous and/or prejudiced information distributed by the very agency that should be guiding our medical choices. The experts in those agencies are already resigning in protest and are being recruited by countries who recognize that vaccines have saved millions of lives over the years. So, in addition to dying because of misinformation, we face a brain drain in any scientific area you can name (and it’s already happening.)

It’s not about draining the swamp—it’s about drowning it in sycophancy. DJT’s vulnerability to flattery was recognized by Russia way back in the eighties, and they certainly are getting their money’s worth for their support. (And they don’t even have to stop bombing Ukrainian citizens, but are actually stepping up their attacks. (So much for ending the war in one day!)

WHEN TECH GIANTS RULE—AND YOUR STATE CAN’T STOP THEM

Section 44001: Blocks states from regulating AI, education tech, or privacy standards for 10 years.

Even if your state wants to protect your kids from unregulated AI or TikTok-style data mining—it can’t. Even Margery Taylor Greene, the laughingstock of the bunch for her antics and lack of knowledge admitted she didn’t know about this AI regulation and doesn’t like it. (Comes under the category of “Even a blind pig….”)

Trump’s bill hands the future of technology to unaccountable megacorporations. Read the Peter Thiel piece on this blog; consult Substack for more on the topic.

WHEN THERE’S NO ONE LEFT TO WATCH THE POWERFUL

Sections 50002, 50003, 80121(h): Guts the CFPB, PCAOB, and court oversight of fossil fuel permits.

Corporate fraud? Unsafe consumer products? Toxic pollution? Nobody’s checking. Nobody’s stopping it. After all, you can peddle Bibles and gold tennis shoes and Bitcoin (known to be preferred by the criminal element) and perfume and everything else under the sun. There is not one murmur of protest from the GOP in power about this indiscriminate feathering of the Trump nest and this blatant disregard for the emoluments clause of the Constitution, check your conscience at the door!To understand the Emoluments Clause and its implications for Trump, consider the following points:

The Emoluments Clause is found in Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution.
It prohibits federal officials from receiving gifts or payments from foreign states without congressional consent.
The clause aims to prevent corruption and foreign influence in U.S. governance.
Trump faced lawsuits alleging violations due to his business interests receiving payments from foreign entities.
Next, Trump will be attempting to change the emoluments clause via the courts he has stacked,because, after all, perhaps he can pick up the gift of another free luxury airplane if he just asks.

The powerful will act with impunity—because Trump removed the referees.

WHEN BLUE STATES PAY THE PRICE FOR CARING

Section 44131: Penalizes states that expanded Medicaid (i.e., most blue states)

If your state worked hard to give people healthcare, it now gets less federal funding. Why? Because this bill rewards cruelty and punishes compassion. (See Steven Miller and Tom Holman for examples of cruelty and lack of compassion in living form.)

Trump said it himself: “I have the right to do whatever I want.”

This bill gives him that power—with your tax dollars.

This is not a warning.

This is happening.

It’s theft wrapped in a flag.

It’s censorship, cruelty, control—and collapse.

.Joni Ernst

If you live in Iowa, remember that one of your Senators is over 90 and the other one, Joni Ernst’s response, at a town hall meeting that pointed out how many citizens could die because of Medicaid cuts, responded that “Everybody dies” and then traveled to a cemetery to film a sarcastic response that also involved mentioning the Tooth Fairy and looking to God for help. This same female Senator, who served in the Armed Forces, voted to confirm a totally unqualified individual to become Secretary of Defense.

If you’ve been silent, speak up and vote the GOP out in the mid-terms, before they destroy our democracy and the trust of the citizens in nearly every once-trustworthy institution (if that hasn’t already happened). Even Elon Musk, the Godfather of DOGE, recognized what a terrible bill Trump’s bill was and how much it will add to our national debt. The Republican party was afraid to go after Medicare to fund tax cuts for the richest Americans, so they went after Medicaid and the poor instead, all the while hiding behind the patiotic notion of expelling illegal aliens (primarily Latinos). While they promised to focus on the most dangerous criminal element, the records show that many of the “illegal aliens” are not criminal elements at all. Remember: those in this country illegally who have been working picking our crops, cleaning our houses, working at our slaughtering houses, have paid into Social Security but can never derive any benefits from the money they paid in. Just as there was no pre-planning or selectivity when all of the January 6th rioters were turned loose (some straight from prison), there has been no true careful planning of the campaign to deport illegal aliens. The entire game plan has been to “blame Biden” at every turn, even though much of the “blaming” is lying. There is never any accountability for a malignant narcissist who would stack every government organization with only Trump loyalists to the point that we have become a kakistrocracy (look it up).

Knowledge is power.

Please share this information and educate fellow Americans.

We can only hope and pray that, with help from Russia and computer hackers and access to networks like StarLink, with computer experts like those on the DOGE task force, the GOP hasn’t already fixed our previously fair election process beyond repair. There are some indications that this may have occurred; it appears that there is nothing DJT won’t authorize if it allows him retain power and make money. That’s the kind of leader Donald J. Trump (and his cronies) is. It’s been quite clear from the outset, since past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior.

Trump is a convicted felon, a businessman who bankrupted his own companies multiple times (6?) and seems hell-bent, with this bill, on bankrupting the USA. Perhaps that is what the money from Russia that bailed Trump out numerous times is demanding as payback for their longstanding (nearly 40 years) support. Jeffrey Epstein described him as “my best friend” and then died, somewhat mysteriously. We were warned early on what might happen if DJT were to regain power. And now it has.

The mid-terms, like winter, are coming. Make them count. Make those responsible for this travesty pay. Vote them out.

“The Manchurian Candidate:” From Fiction to Fact?

By Connie Wilson

On July 3, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics

Donald J. Trump cut-out

“The story begins in March 1986, when Soviet ambassador Yuri Dubinin and his daughter Natalia walked into Trump Tower and requested a meeting with Donald Trump.

Natalia told Politico years later that their mission was to “hook” the assumed billionaire, and “Trump melted at once.”

This was the beginning of the KGB’s recruitment of Donald Trump.

The story as it’s told here and on our website is composed of interviews with Soviet / Russian nationals and former KGB agents, reports by reputable sources, and Donald Trump’s own book.

In the mid-1980s, as sympathy for the Soviet Union was waning, KGB head Vladimir Alexandrovich Kryuchkov began exploring new strategies for the intelligence agency to recruit assets abroad.

Primarily, agents were directed to use flattery on potential assets and rely more heavily on “material incentives,” i.e. money, to bring them on board.

Most importantly, they were told to focus on U.S. targets of value – like Donald Trump – who may be able to “actively influence” foreign policy in favor of the Soviet Union.

In The Art of the Deal, Trump writes that he sat next to Yuri Dubinin at a luncheon in 1986 (some time after the Trump Tower meeting).

There, Dubinin completed the first stage in KGB recruitment, offering Trump a “material incentive” he couldn’t refuse.

The incentive, according to Trump’s own book: “a large luxury hotel, across the street from the Kremlin, in partnership with the Soviet government.”

But first, Dubinin would need Trump to meet with some of his associates in Moscow, the second stage of recruitment.

On the Fourth of July, 1987, Donald and Ivana Trump checked into the Intourist hotel in Moscow, a facility allegedly operated and surveilled by the KGB, across the street from the Kremlin.

As far as Trump knew, the purpose of this trip – which was paid for by the Soviet government – was to meet with officials from the country’s tourist agency. But the agents he met with weren’t interested in tourism.

The conversation centered on deals with the Politburo, the highest committee within the Kremlin, and how Trump might be of assistance to the KGB.

The operatives fed Trump common KGB talking points and went to great lengths in their efforts to flatter him. They knew from their intel that he was psychologically vulnerable and that flattery was his weak spot.

The KGB used this to their advantage and pretended to be “immensely impressed” by him, according to one former agent. They told him “it’s people like him who could change the world.”

They even went as far as to suggest that he could become president someday.”

Continue reading and get all source links at https://trumpfile.substack.com

Mamdani’s NYC Message to Dems: BE NEW

By Connie Wilson

On June 25, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Politics, Pop Culture

Zohran Mamdani, a thirty-three-year-old left-wing state assemblyman from Queens, on Tuesday night, seemingly defeated the better-known Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary for Mayor of New York City. That doesn’t mean that Cuomo can’t run as an Independent in the actual election against the scandal-plagued incumbent (Eric Adams); only time will tell. Most of Mamdani’s opponents were more established and better known. Mamdani was born October 18, 1991. Take note.

Mamdani’s campaign said it knocked on a million and a half doors across the city—not unprecedented in the annals of municipal politics but probably essential for an unknown. The candidate himself appeared in every conceivable media venue, from the TikTok series “Subway Takes” to “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” earning him the sobriquet “Nonstop Mamdani.” In the mid-June heat, Mamdani walked the length of Manhattan, from Inwood to the Battery. He beat Andrew Cuomo, the former governor, in the first round of ranked-choice voting by about seven percentage points. In campaign buttons and other merch visible across the five boroughs, it was a landslide. Mamdani’s win makes him the first Muslim candidate to be selected as the Democratic candidate for Mayor; he is dubbed a Democratic Socialist.

Mamdani’s central issue of affordability in the city got it right, especially with voters under forty-five. His easy smile and ubiquity fueled a steady rise in the polls. His campaign’s essential theme was that life in New York doesn’t have to be so hard. His campaign platform includes support for free city buses, public child care, city-owned grocery stores, a rent freeze on rent-stabilized units, and building affordable social housing units. He is a critic of Israel.

So far, the experiments in explicitly left-wing governance—as opposed to the principled back-benching of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—have gone badly for the Democratic Party. Mamdani’s proposal of a rent freeze proved popular in the campaign, but Bill de Blasio froze the rent in NYC three times. It has not made New York housing much cheaper. Other ideas like the establishment of five city-run grocery stores seem either a little fanciful or politically difficult, like tax hikes.

During the campaign, Mamdani sometimes appeared a little more flexible than his socialist image. Mamdani has been interested in ideas about how to build more housing, ideas that have germinated in the abundance movement and in attempting to cut red tape for small businesses.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.

On another Progressive front, in Chicago, Brandon Johnson’s year and a half as mayor has been semi- disastrous, measured both by the city’s mounting budget crisis and his own plummeting popularity. Chesa Boudin as the avowedly progressive district attorney in San Francisco ended with his removal by voter referendum. That contributed to backlash against Silicone Valley tech that helped power Trump’s victory in the 2024 election. So stay tuned for what this unexpected victory might mean if it leads to Mamdani’s election. Michelle Wu, the young Boston mayor and Elizabeth Warren’s former protégé, has been a more successful model of governance by the left.

Even if Mamdani’s victory was built on hustle in local politics, it also carries an unmistakable message for his beleaguered national party: BE NEW. The Baby Boomers are (finally) giving way to the younger generation. For the first time, Millennials born between 1981 and 1996 comprised 21.81% of the nation’s population.

Generation Z (1997-2012) stood at 20.81%.

Baby Boomers (1946-1964) stood at 19.6% and are dropping like flies.

Generation X born between 1965 and 1980 stand at 19.27%. Only the Silent Generation (1928-1945) and Alpha (2013-2023) stand at only 4.48% and 13.85%, respectively, with the children born during WWII or earlier rapidly losing members, and the present lower birth rate reflected in Alpha.

The younger generation would like to see some reasonable, middle-of-the-road newbies elected. They’d like to see the “passing of the torch” that Joe Biden promised (but did not willingly deliver.) So, BE NEW is the message that the Democratic party should embrace, since so many of its leaders and leadership resemble television’s Crypt Keeper. Watching Chuck Schumer (age 75) talk about drafting a letter of protest against Trump’s many illegal moves, or Dick Durbin (Nov. 21, 1944) pontificating about same, does not inspire confidence. Both sides need some new blood, but the Democrats seem to need it the most.

Vice President J.D. Vance.

The GOP already has the eyeliner-wearing J.D. Vance warming up in the bull-pen. Unless you want 4 more years of marching backwards and telling women to STFU, stay in the kitchen, and procreate, be afraid. Be very afraid.

During the long and often difficult years since Obama’s election, the Party’s past three Presidential nominees have been Obama’s Secretary of State, Obama’s Vice-President, and Obama’s Vice-President’s Vice-President. Joe Biden’s precipitous decline defined last year’s election. Biden’s disastrous debate performance may threaten to define the Party for a generation. This past spring, Democrats in the House lost a vote they might have won, for passage of a budget-reconciliation bill, except too many Democratic congressman died and couldn’t be replaced in time to vote. For those decrying the idea of dying in office, like San Francisco representative Diane Feinstein, even the indomitable Nancy Pelosi looked her age after she tumbled downstairs while overseas, breaking her hip.

Of course, the Republicans conveniently try to downplay their own fossils, like 92-year-old Chuck Grassley, currently the oldest Senator serving. Who can forget Mitch McConnell (Feb. 20, 1942) freezing in the Capitol halls and falling. (The mighty, how they have fallen.) Republicans had several Senators who overstayed their welcome, including John Stennis (R, MI), who served over 41 years and Orrin Hatch (R, Utah) who served from 1977 until 2019.

Trump is seventy-nine years old and has been President twice. He and his party can’t run as the outsiders forever. Democrats: be new.

Iran Nuclear Program: Obliterated or Ongoing?

By Connie Wilson

On June 24, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics, Scary stories

Did the United States just poke a stick into the wasps’ nest? Is Trump telling the truth (for a change) when he tells us from the White House that our strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities had “totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, or are we going to have to buckle up for an extremely bumpy future ride?

There are conflicting opinions on whether or not the damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities from our bunker buster bombs has been substantial. Some reports (i.e., DJT) say we have totally obliterated the Iranian nuclear program. Some of the assessment of damage post-bombing has been described as being more cosmetic. And, too, there is the very relevant question of whether or not the Iranians moved the uranium before the bombs fell.

Although Iran’s foreign minister said the US had crossed a “very big red line,” other Iranian leaders downplayed the strikes’ impact. Manan Raeisi, a lawmaker representing the city of Qom, near Fordow, said the damage from the attack was “quite superficial. (Consider the source). A CNN analysis of imagery collected before the US strikes suggests that Iran had taken steps to reinforce the entrances to the tunnels believed to lead into the underground facility. This was, no doubt, done in anticipation of a coming strike. That imagery showed dirt piled up in front of at least two of the six entrances. The Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites sustained varying degrees of damage. Satellite imagery and reports indicate significant damage to the above-ground structures and potential damage to underground facilities at Natanz.

While Iran can likely rebuild its nuclear program, it will be a difficult and time-consuming process, potentially vulnerable to further sabotage or attacks. While some U.S. officials (i.e. the Prevaricator-in-Chief, Donald J. Trump) initially claimed the program was completely obliterated, independent experts and satellite imagery suggest a more nuanced picture. There are indications that there was only partial damage to critical infrastructure of nuclear facilities like Fordow.

So, just like a little kid poking a stick in the wasps’ nest, keep your eyes peeled for some very angry wasps coming for the United States. And do you think they’ll be as mad as hell about that stick? By the way, our fearless leader let loose with a “WTF” fully articulated on national television. He seemed very frustrated by the hostility between Israel and Iran. Go figure. Maybe Trump should take up reading (which sources say he does not do) and read up on this ancient rivalry that goes back to the very beginning of the formation of the country of Israel on May 14, 1948, when DJT was 2 years old.

Trump Orders Bunker Buster Bombs Be Dropped on Iran on 6/21/25

By Connie Wilson

On June 22, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics

Stealth bombers carried bunker buster bombs (six 30,000 bunker busters) and dropped then on Iran when President Trump authorized this military strike without consulting Congress.

Senator Chris Van Hollen, Democrat of Maryland, framed the risks this way: “While we all agree that Iran must not have a nuclear weapon, Trump abandoned diplomatic efforts to achieve that goal and instead chose to unnecessarily endanger American lives, further threaten our armed forces in the region and risk pulling America into another long conflict in the Middle East. The U.S. intelligence community has repeatedly assessed that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon. There was more time for diplomacy to work.”

There are 40,000 U.S. troops in or near Iran. Has Trump thought about what happens to them now, or is this another ham-handed poorly-thought-out DOGE-style move?

It’s too soon to know the answer to that question, but we must hope and pray that the scientists and military minds left in Iran are not (still) capable of taking enriched uranium and building a bomb. At 9:25 a.m., from Tehran on CNN, an Iranian official described a populace that was previously quite fed up with its reigning administration, but, like all countries under attack, this action may change the Iranian public’s mind.

The quote from Senator Chris Van Hollen and the illustration are courtesy of the New York Times.

The King of Chaos: Donald J. Trump

By Connie Wilson

On June 21, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Politics

BEE GONE cover

The United States has had 47 Presidents. To the best of my memory, we have never had one who thrives on chaos and seeks to create it. Now we have one who is a divider, not a uniter. One late night host dubbed Donald J. Trump the King of Chaos.

Trump’s admiration for strong men (Russian, Turkish, North Korean) seems to know no bounds. His decisions ever since Trump 2.0 seem to be marching orders straight from Moscow. Nearly every one of the decisions from tariffs to ham-handed ICE deportation raids have been lauded on Russian state TV. Almost none of them have enhanced our standing in the world or made us more stable in any way.

I covered some of Trump’s rallies in 2016. I had covered every presidential caucus run in Iowa since 2000, but Trump’s rallies were the end of that, for me. It no longer felt safe. Crowds were encouraged to display hostility towards the Press, which is one of the first things a would-be dictator will attempt to do. Transparency, which the fourth estate provides via journalists staying on top of the story, is one of democracy’s safeguards. There are documented instances, at Trump rallies, when he would urge the crowd to turn against the press present. After the incident in Butler, Pennsylvania, press was singled out for abuse.

I came home from a Trump rally at the Davenport (Iowa) fairgrounds in the election of 2016 and announced that I was going back to reviewing movies. I was threatened only because I wore a Press badge.

Why?

“This isn’t fun any more,” I told my spouse.

It was not long after this that the Democrats moved their first-in-the-nation caucus voting to South Carolina, anyway, which meant Iowa would be All Republican, All the Time. That made the caucuses much less meaningful (and definitely less fun).

A New Political Era?

According to New Yorker writer Wallace-Wells, the recent Minneapolis assassination of one elected official, and the attempted assassination of another, confirm the arrival of a new political era, in which the expectation and the fear of political violence are endemic.

But is this threat of violence really new? I would submit that the expectation and the fear of political violence are, indeed, endemic, but this is not a “new era.” It’s more prevalent, perhaps, but it has been around seemingly forever.

For me, the fear of violence at a political rally, after sixteen years of attending them routinely without incident, was driven home in 2016 during the campaign for Trump 1.0. That was nearly ten years ago. The encouragement of such bad behavior started with Donald J. Trump—a man known for plenty of bad behavior of his own.

Gabby Giffords

There have been incidents involving violence or threats of violence at political gatherings before. On January 8, 2011, United States Representative Gabby Giffords and 18 others were shot during a constituent meeting held in a supermarket parking lot in Casas Adobes, Arizona, in the Tucson metropolitan area.

Six people were killed, including federal District Court Chief Judge John Roll; Gabe Zimmerman, one of Giffords’s staffers; and a nine-year-old girl, Christina-Taylor Green. Giffords was holding a meeting called “Congress on Your Corner” in the parking lot of a Safeway store when Jared Lee Loughner drew a pistol and shot her through the head at point-blank range before proceeding to fire on others.

I’ve recently written about the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., Robert F. Kennedy. Certainly we all remember presidential assassinations going all the way back to Abraham Lincoln. Such political violence peaked, in my lifetime, in 1968, following JFK’s death in Texas on November 22, 1963. But it is most definitely true that political strife can turn deadly.

Trump’s effect on rising tension is to throw more lighter fluid on the fire. Not only does he not try to calm political turmoil. Instead, he seems to thrive on chaos, something that has been a hallmark of other autocratic dictators.

MINNESOTA MURDERER

Vance Boelter

The man suspected of killing a Minnesota lawmaker and wounding another was taken into custody after a two-day search. Vance Boelter was arrested Sunday evening, June 17, after two days on the loose following the shooting of former Democratic House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. The couple were killed in their Brooklyn Park home early Saturday, June 16, 2025, in that northern Minneapolis suburbs. Sen. John Hoffman, also a Democrat, and his wife, Yvette, were injured at their Champlin home, about 9 miles away. Only good police work kept the tragedy from becoming much worse.

THE TRUMP EFFECT

The job of the Minnesota police could not have been helped by the fact that the past decade has seen the rise of an unstable environment around politics and law enforcement—one that arguably worsened on January 6^th. On that date, MAGA faithful stormed the Capitol and Donald Trump celebrated the vigilantes who attacked the Capitol police force as “warriors.” Later, Trump pardoned the miscreants doing time for their decision to take the law into their own hands. There was little apparent thought or selectivity given to the pardons, which can also be said of ICE raids, immigrants deported, and DOGE targets. It’s always a poorly-thought-out and poorly executed slipshod undertaking, another hallmark of Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0. We have become a kakistocracy.

Benjamin Wallace-Wells, dubbed the Minnesota shootings a dangerous trend in the June 17th “New Yorker,” specifically cited the impersonating of law enforcement officers. Said Wallace-Wells, “A new political era has arrived, in which the expectation and the fear of political violence are endemic.”

While I do not disagree with Wallace-Well’s statement, I do disagree that this is “a new political era.” We’ve been experiencing deaths of political figures in the United States all the way back to the Civil War era (Lincoln, again). What is “new” about the incidents, however, is that now we have a President who seems to revel in mayhem. One of his MAGA followers even posted inappropriate remarks following the Saturday killings, because that is what good MAGA followers do: glorify violence and seize any opportunity to repeat lies that their fearless leader has convinced them of using social media.

THE TRAGEDY

Around 2 A.M. on Saturday morning, operators manning emergency lines in the Minneapolis suburb of Champlin, according to a police report, got a call from someone who said that a masked man had come to their home “and then shot their parents.” When police and medics arrived, they discovered that the victims were a Democratic state senator named John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, who were alive, but badly injured.

A sergeant from the nearby city of Brooklyn Park, who had helped respond to the call, asked officers from his jurisdiction to check on the home of the Democratic state legislator Melissa Hortman, who was until recently the state House speaker. According to the Brooklyn Park police chief, Mark Bruley, when the officers arrived, at about 3:35 A.M., they saw a “vehicle that looked exactly like an S.U.V. squad car.” The vehicle was parked in the driveway with its emergency lights on. The front door was open. The officers saw a man dressed like a cop firing into it; he killed Hortman and her husband, Mark. The officers fired at the shooter—since identified as Vance Boelter, a fifty-seven-year-old evangelical Christian and MAGA Trump follower. A website of Boelter’s said that he was an ordained minister.

Boelter had a scattered work history. He had recently been employed by local funeral-service companies and also was trying to launch his security business, but a close friend of his said that his back-and-forth trips to Africa exhausted him, financially, and made steady employment and a steady income difficult. Boelter ran back into the house and escaped for close to 2 days. He was arrested on Sunday evening. He has been charged with federal murder, which carries the death penalty.

Impersonating an Officer

Who Boelter is, and the exact nature of his objectives and perceived grievances, may ultimately be less noteworthy than whom he pretended to be. Boelter’s motives aren’t yet clear, though he possessed what police have suggested may have been a target list of seventy individuals, many of whom are Democratic politicians. Just tonight (June 21^st) a young man (25-year-old Trenton Abston) attempted to confront the Mayor of Memphis with a taser. The Mayor lived in a gated community with security, but Abston climbed over a brick wall to reach the Mayor’s door. The Governor of Michigan was also the target of a foiled kidnapping attempt.

A state legislator summoned to his or her door well after midnight may be wary about opening it, but he or she may be less reluctant if the person on the step is uniformed and there’s a cop car parked on the street. As it turns out, Boelter was driving an S.U.V. that he had outfitted for his security business. He made the deliberate decision to leave the emergency lights on.

It was very smart of the real Brooklyn Park police officers to suspect what was happening. Their quick reaction saved lives. At a news conference on Monday, June 16^th, authorities in Minnesota revealed that Boelter had visited at least two other homes between Hoffman’s and Hortman’s. No one was home at one, and he seemed to have been scared away at the other.

ICE in Action

The politicization of law enforcement has acquired a new dimension during the immigration crackdowns. The Trump Administration has allowed its agents to disguise their identities or affiliations so that it is often unclear to detainees whose custody they are in, or under what authority. In Boston, in March federal agents arrested Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University graduate student who had co-written a pro-Palestine op-ed in a campus newspaper. The agents were in plain clothes and masked.

Recently the White House deployed seven hundred marines to Los Angeles, purportedly to help quell the protests against immigration raids. Photos spread of them detaining a protester. Catherine Rampell, of the Washington Post, reported last week on an immigration raid targeting a landscaper working outside a boutique home-design business in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. Agents showed up in masks and tactical gear and refused to show IDs, warrants or even give the names of any criminals they were supposedly hunting. In the piece, Rampell spoke to the business’s co-owner, Linda Shafiroff. She said, “It could have been like a band of the Proud Boys or something.”

In each of these circumstances, the federal government is asking ordinary people to trust that those wearing uniforms are acting on behalf of the public, while also allowing them to shroud their identity and their mission, and pushing the boundaries of what law enforcement can do. It is hard to imagine a scenario more perfectly engineered for exploitation.

In February, a man wearing an ICE jacket at the Conservative Political Action Conference, outside Washington, D.C., admitted to a podcaster that he had no affiliation with the agency, but said of his jacket, “It’s $29.99 on Amazon. I would recommend buying a small, if you’re my size.”

In Philadelphia, police sought a man who had entered a car-repair shop wearing fake security apparel. He yelled “Immigration!,” which caused some employees to scatter. He then proceeded to tie up a worker and rob the business. By the end of March, the fake-ICE situation had grown sufficiently common in Southern California that the Los Angeles Times ran a feature titled “ICE impersonators and other scammers are on the rise: How to protect yourself.”

Some of these impersonators are scamming for money. Others, especially those harassing migrants, may be expressing solidarity with the President’s political aims. The leaky membrane that Trump has established between law enforcement and his own agenda does a disservice to the officers, many of whom are simply trying to do their jobs. It also makes their work more dangerous. The more lawless the government is, the easier it is for lawless individuals to impersonate officers. Also, the more likely it is that citizens will doubt that the real officers actually represent a legal authority.

This is a recipe for generalized mistrust. For citizens to know who an armed federal agent really is, and what authority he is operating under, should be part of even the most basic commitment to transparency. At a minimum, courts and politicians should pressure government agents to disclose their identities during raids and detentions, and to clarify where their authority begins and ends.

In California’s Central Valley, as immigration raids peaked, school attendance reportedly dropped by twenty-two per cent. Immigrants are frightened to keep appointments, attend church, or show up at work, in some cases, for fear the Steven Miller/Stephen Homan heavy hand of the law will be deployed in the same manner it was in throwing an elected member of Congress, Senator Padilla, to the floor and handcuffing him, because he attempted to ask Homeland Security Chief Kristy Noem a question at a public meeting.

On Saturday, at an anti-Trump No Kings protest in Salt Lake City, Utah, a man reportedly appeared to be crouching behind a wall, while carrying what looked like an AR-15-style rifle. Several armed people whom the police referred to as “peacekeepers” providing security for the protest—though whether this role was official or self-assigned was under investigation—pulled their own weapons and yelled. One fired at the man, managing to disarm him but killing a bystander.

SPILL-OVER EFFECT

anti ICE demonstration in Davenport, Iowa

Demonstrators in Davenport protested both the autocratic behavior of DJT and his ICE raids.

Sadly, the trickle-down theory that Republicans love, is in play again in the behaviors to which Trump has affixed his seal of approval. It is okay to discriminate against homosexuals, women, transgender individuals and people of color, because that is what attacks on DEI sanction. Anti-Semitism is up while evangelical group support the man who, right now, has put us on the verge of WWIII and unleashed Elon Musk and DOGE on nearly every government institution, ruining them and the careers of the public servants employed there.

Other Examples of Trickle-down Tump Deterioration

I am old enough to remember when air travel was a delight. You actually dressed up to eat your TV-dinner style entrée onboard. Then planes began to be hijacked, 9/11 happened, and now we all dread the TSA steps that bad behavior has doomed us to endure in order to fly at all.

In much the same vein, outdoor concerts were once great fun. Until they weren’t. People who remember the slaughter in Las Vegas at an open air concert think twice. It isn’t even safe to attend a Fourth of July Parade in broad daylight anymore. We learned that after a Fourth of July parade in a Chicago suburb.

Trump is, slowly but surely, undermining trust in elected officials and in government institutions that have functioned well for 250 years, but which are now struggling to function at all. (Some have been eliminated by presidential fiat.)

Trump’s Legacy

Trump’s legacy to America, among many things, is most damaging in regards to undermining good behavior, civility, trust in institutions and our leaders and the press (in addition to non-stop crass commercial capitalization while in (and off of) the Oval Office.)

The emoluments clause of the Constitution (Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8) has been completely disregarded. The Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution is actually two clauses that restrict federal officials, especially the President, from receiving gifts, payments, or other benefits from foreign or domestic sources without Congressional consent. These clauses are designed to prevent corruption and undue influence on government officials by foreign powers or other entities.

Charging supplicants to attend his Mar-A-Lago bash recently and his unabashed greed in asking for a new Air Force One plane during his recent Middle East trip are just the tip of the iceberg. In Trump 1.0 foreign dignitaries knew that they should stay at Trump’s hotel if they wanted to do business with the executive branch. DJT has come out with tennis shoes, Bibles, with bitcoin and cheap gold cell phones, further sullying the office of the President of the United States. Why is Congress allowing this?

“The times, they are a-changing” and, so far, that is not a good thing.

Is Trump A Russian Asset?

By Connie Wilson

On June 18, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Local, Politics

Senator Jeff Merkley (D, OR).

Nato Ambassador Nominee is questioned by Oregon Senator Phil Merkley on March 4, 2025.

Jeff Merkley has been Oregon’s Senator since 2008.

From Wikipedia:

“In June 2018, Merkley received national attention when he attempted to visit a facility holding the children of jailed adults who had attempted to cross the border to seek asylum. Children were separated from their parents and placed in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement. Merkley filmed his attempt to visit a facility in a former Walmart in Brownsville, Texas. He was denied entrance and the police were called and arrived as he continued to try to speak with the facility administrator. He commented in the film: “I think it’s unacceptable that a member of Congress is not being admitted to see what is happening to children whose families are applying for asylum. I decided to come out here, go up to the door and ask to be let in.” By midday the video had garnered more than one million viewers.^[35]

Was 2024 Rigged? More Strange Days Ahead.

By Connie Wilson

On June 16, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Interviews, Local, News, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics

trio of Elon Musk, Donald Trump and Peter Thiel

Has it ever occurred to you that Elon Musk, with his Starlink expertise, may well have “fixed” the vote for DJT in 2024? I’m sure it has. Certain irregularities were noted in some of the swing states. Investigation of this has been ongoing and a Substack writer has assembled the article below. If I could find the writer’s name, it would appear here. I filled in the blank for being on the receiving end of further articles, but the name of the actual investigator/writer was MIA, as far as I can tell. Maybe that is for purposes of safety. You either get credit or blame. If you’ve watched “Good Night and Good Luck” that showed recently on CNN, you know that speaking truth to power is the rule to protect our democracy.

Is the article below well-researched enough to be labeled as “truth?” You can be the judge of that. I’m not vouching for it or its writer, but I am sharing it, because it confirms the suspicions that many of us harbor about the 2024 presidential race.

Again, do your own further research and—if you find the name of this Substack writer—I’ll happily give full credit (or blame?) to that individual, but I was not quite ready to sign up for $55. I was ready to consider this individual’s thoughts on what may have happened. I still am. I’m not swearing on a stack of Bibles that this is the truth, but it certainly has a lot of food for thought.

So, chew on this.

****************

A Power Cord Becomes a Backdoor

In March 2021, Leonard Leo—the judicial kingmaker behind the modern conservative legal machine—sold a quiet Chicago company by the name of Tripp Lite for $1.65 billion. The buyer: Eaton Corporation, a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to have a partnership with Peter Thiel’s Palantir.

To most, Tripp Lite was just a hardware brand—battery backups, surge protectors, power strips. But in America’s elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely.

They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers across the country. And they aren’t dumb devices. They are smart UPS units—programmable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with the election system via USB, serial port, or Ethernet.

ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.

If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment—without ever modifying certified election software.

In Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as “optional”—meaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight. Optional means unregulated. Unregulated means invisible. And invisible means perfect for infiltration

2024 VOTE

On Monday, an investigator’s story finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.

These changes were labeled “de minimis”—a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.

That revelation is a shock to the public.

But for those who’ve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn’t the headline—it’s the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain—between tech giants and Donald Trump.

And it started with a long forgotten sale.

ELECTION FRAUD?

BallotProof: The Front-End for Scrubbing Democracy

Enter the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. Co-created by Ethan Shaotran, a longtime employee of Elon Musk and current DOGE employee, BallotProof was pitched as a transparency solution—an app to “verify” scanned ballot images and support election integrity.

With Palantir’s AI controlling the backend, and BallotProof cleaning the front, only one thing was missing: the signal to go live.

September 2024: Eaton and Musk Make It Official

Then came the final public breadcrumb:
In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk.
The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on “grid resilience” and “next-generation communications.”

But buried in the partnership documents was this line:

“Exploring integration with Starlink’s emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.”

The Activation: Starlink Goes Direct-to-Cell

That signal came on October 30, 2024—just days before the election, Musk activated 265 brand new low Earth orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network.

DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.

From that moment on:
– Commands could be sent from orbit
– Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
– Compromised devices could be triggered remotely

This groundbreaking project that should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months.

Elon Musk boasts endlessly about everything he’s launching, building, buying—or even just thinking about—whether it’s real or not. But he pulls off one of the largest and fastest technological feats in modern day history… and says nothing? One might think that was kind of… “weird.”

Lasers From Space

Elon Musk.

According to New York Times reporting, on October 5—just before Starlink’s DTC activation—Musk texted a confidant:

“I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.”

Then, an hour later:

“This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.”

This wasn’t a theory. It was a full-scale operation. A systemic digital occupation—clean, credentialed, and remote-controlled.

The Outcome

Data that makes no statistical sense. A clean sweep in all seven swing states.
The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped red—not one flipped blue.
Every victory landed just under the threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Donald Trump outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seen—while Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas.

If one were to accept these results at face value—Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan. According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance:

“These anomalies didn’t happen nationwide. They didn’t even happen across all voting methods—this just doesn’t reflect human voting behavior.”

They were concentrated.
Targeted.
Specific to swing states and Texas—and specific to Election Day voting.

And the supposed explanation? “Her policies were unpopular.”

Let’s think this through logically. We’re supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris’s platform that they voted blue down ballot—but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket?

Not in early voting.
Not by mail.
With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day.
And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been cast—where VP Harris’s numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trump’s suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, “C’mon, man.”

In the world of election data analysis, there’s a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm.

Billionaires and Tech Giants Pulled Off the Crime of the Century

Why? There wasn’t just one reason—there were many.

Elon Musk himself hinted at the stakes: he faced the real possibility of a prison sentence if Trump lost. He launched his bid for Twitter—at $20 billion over market value—just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. But when the ROI is $15 trillion in mineral rights tied to Ukraine losing the war and geopolitical deals Trump could green light, it wasn’t a loss—it was leverage.

It’s no secret Musk was in communication with Putin for over two years. He even granted Starlink access to Russian forces.

Then there’s Peter Thiel and the so-called “broligarchs”—tech billionaires who worship at the altar of shower-avoidant blogger Curtis Yarvin. They casually joke about “humane genocide for non-producers” and have long viewed democracy as a nuisance—an obstacle to their vision of hypercapitalism and themselves as the permanent ruling elite.

Well, what is the elimination of Medicaid if not “humane genocide”—and does anyone really wonder why his 40-year-old protégé and political rookie, JD Vance, is Vice President? With this technology in place, if the third-term legislation were to pass, it would hand Vance a minimum of twelve years at the helm of Thiel’s regime.

And of course, Donald Trump himself:
He spent a year telling his followers he didn’t need their votes—at one point stating,

“…in four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.”

Trump was facing eighty-eight felony indictments—he was desperate to avoid conviction and locked in a decades-long alliance with Vladimir Putin. An alliance that’s now impossible to ignore—look no further than his policy trail.

He froze aid to Ukraine and has threatened to place sanctions on them, while planning to lift sanctions off Russia. He openly campaigned for anti-EU candidates, and sided with Russia in multiple key United Nations votes related to the Ukraine conflict.

[Comments on the interview above]

(*Note that Elon testifies that DJT did not seem concerned about 2 so-called “assassination attempts,” one of which supposedly hit his ear, which, miraculously, healed almost overnight leaving no trace of such an injury.) Elon’s assertions about illegals being bussed to swing states are unverified and have no basis in fact. Conversely, Musk’s antagonistic attitude towards people of color, a product of his South African heritage, is well-documented as is that of his father before him. The purpose of “no ID to vote, says Musk, is “obviously” to influence elections when there are other viable explanations, but identification to vote has never been something that Democrats oppose. Elon lays out which 6 states need to be targeted late in the interview and note the many “obviously” affirmations, which are not “obvious” at all.

His admission that Pete Buttigieg did a good job is to his credit, but contentions that billionaires are “for sure” more in the Democratic camp are debatable. The attack on the media as biased is, again, a GOP and Russian staple. Court comments are also part of the Communist playbook. Elon worries that “everything is on the side of the Dems” and denigrates Kamala Harris’s candidacy, saying that nobody voted for her. (Kamala was part of the elected ticket in 2020.)

Late-in-the-interview comments about not becoming a one-party elite ruling class are ironic; that is exactly what Elon’s infusion of cash was intended to create. The fact that Elon Musk denigrates Harris, (who was a woman of great achievement prior to her election as VP), is also telling. He puts her down continuously while ignoring the “marionette” nature of DJT’s public remarks. Many of Trump’s public statements make no sense at all lately, so comparing the remarks of the two candidates word-for-word as to eloquence would be interesting.

Musk claims that billionaires are terrified that their support for Harris’s candidacy might come out, which seems to be simply his view, again unsupported by fact. Epstein’s name comes up late in the interview, which is interesting considering how he later announced that Trump’s name would appear on the Lolita Express rolls and that he was involved, which has been previously reported. “If Trump wins, we can do some housecleaning and shed light on things. Adhere to freedom of speech within the bounds of the law” are remarks made late in the interview, which is also ironic, as there has been little effort to stay within the bounds of the law but extreme efforts to do the opposite. Elon notes that he fears a Harris win would put “X”—which he had recently bought and which he had semi-ruined—out of business. He mentions a lawsuit against “X” regarding hiring permanent residents or citizens. He mentions a lawsuit against Space X for trying to hire asylum seekers. He also mentions Stalin’s chief enforcer, who is mentioned in the recent documentary “Mr. Nobody Against Putin.” Elon admits that he fears a Democratic majority might shut his businesses down. Obviously, he decided to back the candidate who would shine on his pursuits.

Elon’s remarks about freedom and opportunity open the door to interpretation about the freedom and opportunity that he has bought for himself and his own pursuits. Talk about “improving the liberty of Americans” ignores his future role as the DOGEfather, firing people willy-nilly with chainsaw tactics.

Musk’s remarks about over-regulation have merit, but doing away with all regulatory agencies is folly. “There are so many different regulatory agencies and so many different regulations that we won’t be able to get anything done.” Some truth in those remarks, but let’s not forget that the developer of the Titan ignored regulations in pursuit of deep-see tourism to the wreck of the “Titanic” and we all know how that ended (good documentary about it streaming now.) He also touches on vaccination. “I don’t enjoy hurting other people. I have a hard time imagining, ‘Why would someone do that?'” (This from the man who literally ruined many careers with his DOGE antics.)

“There’s a small % of Americans who have anger management issues that cause them to hurt other people. If you don’t incarcerate them, they will hurt other people.” This leads Musk to talk about empathy for the victims, rather than the perpetrators. In examining anger management issues, Musk might have looked closer to home to the man he supported who has been on an 8-year-long crusade for retribution and is now exercising his power as president to “punish” all who defied him. (The law firm where Kamala Harris’s husband worked was one target, among many).

There is an interesting Tucker Carlson reference to Minneapolis as being a nice city “pre George Floyd.” This was before Vance Boelter (on left) began systematically trying to wipe out all elected Democrats in the city in pre-dawn raids. Musk further decries the deterioration of modern American cities, which Carlson terms “ubiquitous.” Musk says, “I’ve got to lead by being compassionate” and then goes on a Trump-designated stampede to literally ruin the careers and lives of many in the sights of DOGE. (Shakes head.) Musk’s axe-murderer example is pretty far out and leads Tucker to call this “anti-civilization.” Movement to de-criminalize crime is brought up and seems to point most notably to the MAGA crowd that attacked the Capitol on January 6th and were subsequently found guilty, sentenced and then pardoned wholesale with no real attempt to pardon in any kind of reasonable, sensible, logical manner (which also seems to be true of most DOGE initiatives.)

Near the end of the interview, Musk comments on Europe, saying that the birth rate is declining (Musk has 14 kids by multiple women, one of whom is trans-gender and hates him) and that that needs to be addressed. He also rails against censorship in Europe. Those of us who reside in Austin are watching Musk’s assembling of a sort of harem of his offspring and their mothers, which isn’t going too well, so far. It is also designed to help with the housing shortage for new Tesla employees. He then begins talking about the decline of religion and the increasing secular nature of society. Work takes the place of religion, says Musk. (Someone please remind the GOP of the founding fathers wish that there be separation of church and state.) “For me, I’m culturally Christian but also went to a Hebrew pre-school. I didn’t fall for believing all of these religious stories. I try to understand as much as possible about reality. In physics you’re not supposed to believe everything absolutely. If your rocket is designed with physics in mind correctly it will get to orbit, or otherwise it will not.” (Lately, more “not” than “will”).

“We definitely went to the moon. How about Mars? It was a remarkable piece of technology for 1969 and it was an important ideological battle with Communism, because they couldn’t put a man on the moon and capitalism could.”

No Kings Protest, Davenport, Iowa 6/14/2025

By Connie Wilson

On June 14, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Local, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics

Kate, a No Kings protester in Davenport, Iowa, and a former Marine

Kate, a No Kings protester in Davenport, Iowa on June 14, 2025.

Today, while dining in Iowa at an establishment known to be Trump-friendly, I witnessed parts of the Trump parade, despite my intention to ignore this $43 million DJT birthday celebration. The parade masqueraded as a celebration of the birthday of the U.S. Army, just as our rejection of centuries of Canadian friendship and alliance was attributed to the microscopically small amount of fentanyl that Donald Trump claimed was being smuggled across the Canadian border into the U.S.

Earlier in the day I attended the No Kings demonstration in Davenport, Iowa—one of hundreds of such demonstrations across the United States. There is no question that the many cities participating saw millions protesting the most destructive, divisive and disruptive presidency in history.

Kate, Marine Corporal, at No Kings protest in Davenport, Iowa

Kate, from California and Utah, served four years in the Marine Corps as a Corporal.

It was a surreal dining experience. We were bombarded with patriotic music (mostly country music) while dining, Lee Greenwood tunes cranked to the max. It was creepy, upon entering, to see a life-sized cut-out of Donald Trump.

Outside the restaurant stood a gigantic GOP elephant. A recruiting van and truck stood outside the door, urging patrons to help elect a convicted felon who doesn’t read briefings, plays more golf than any president in history, and has single-handedly visited more grief and disruption upon us, as a nation, than any of his 46 predecessors.

Davenport, Iowa, demonstrators on 6/14/2025.

And high on the list of those who have suffered the most are the farmers of this and every other Iowa county. When will minorities and those most affected wake up and see what this man is doing to them, while posing as some television version of a “manly man”? It’s absolutely bonkers to realize that those most negatively impacted by Trump have become his biggest champions. Based on what? His stint on TV as a successful businessman on “The Apprentice,” perhaps, despite his multiple bankruptcies and the truth.

Meanwhile—to add to the surreal nature of my day— while dining, a deluded Black commentator talked about how united we are as a country. W-H-A-A-T?

It was a stunning reminder of just how UNdivided we really are.

Police in L.A. were deploying flash bangs to dispel a protesting crowd.

Demonstrators in Davenport protested both the autocratic behavior of DJT and his ICE raids.

A madman in Minneapolis was shooting elected Democrats in cold blood.

Meanwhile, on Brady Street in Davenport, Iowa,—the 148^th largest metropolitan area in the United States— protesters were waving signs against Trump, while motorists sped by and honked in support (some even waving signs of their own).

Across the Mississippi River in Schweibert Park (Rock Island, Illinois), an even larger turnout from the neighboring Democratic state, protested President Trump’s more outrageous actions.

No Kings protest, Davenport, Iowa, 6/14/25

Roughly 200 Davenport (Iowa) protestors gathered on June 14, 2025 on Brady Street.

Davenport had a population of 101,724 as of the 2020 census, making it Iowa’s third-most populous city, after Des Moines and Cedar Rapids.^[⁵^] It is the largest of the Quad Cities in Iowa and Illinois, a metropolitan area with a population of 384,324 and a combined statistical area population of 474,019.^[⁶^]^[⁷^]

Moline, just across the Mississippi River, is the headquarters of John Deere, one of the most home-grown American companies, and one that DJT recently targeted for criticism because, like other successful American companies, it engages in outsourcing production to neighboring countries, like Canada and Mexico. My husband worked for Deere & Company for 40 years. I know this company well; I can’t think of a more “American” company, yet Trump recently lambasted it for its business practices, which mirror those of every successful modern company in America.

Lifesize DJT cut-out, Treehouse Lounge, Davenport, Iowa

At the No Kings demonstration on Brady Street I spoke with Kate, a Marine Corporal (for 4 years) who was among the youngest demonstraters present at age 35. As someone who protested at Berkeley in 1965 during the Mario Savio years, a child of the 60s, I have seen and participated in demonstrations against the Vietnam War. I stood up with my roommate as she married her Navy husband at China Lake, just prior to his being shipped off to war. As a young pregnant bride, I waited anxiously outside a draft office in Rock Island, Illinois, to see if my new husband, 1A on the draft list, was going to be sent to a war that even former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara grew to regret.

My observations following the demonstrations locally in the Heartland on June 14, 2025 are these:

GOP elephant statue, Treehouse Lounge
In order to rescue our country from the complete disregard for the Constitution that Donald J. Trump represents, my children and grandchildren are going to have to pick up the torch. Those of us who demonstrated in the sixties are with you, in spirit, but it’s up to you now.
Contrary to the African American talking head on television during Donald Trump’s birthday parade, this is not a united country. The barely hidden racism, the misogyny, the anti-Semitism, the dislike of gays and transgender citizens: it’s always been there beneath the surface. Now the surface has become the new reality of the United States. Only threats from outside seem to unite us, as with 9/11. We must work to make a reality of the words of the Constitution about equality and the pursuit of happiness.
We need to right the ship of state as quickly as possible. It will take decades to undo the damage inflicted by DOGE, as it is.
MAGA truck and van

MAGA van

I am ending this report on today’s No Kings demonstration in Davenport by repeating Robert F. Kennedy’s message to the country in Indianapolis after the assassination of Martin Luther King on April 4, 1968.

“What we need in the United States is not division; what we need in the United States is not hatred; what we need in the United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love, and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, and a feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black. … let us dedicate ourselves to what the Greeks wrote so many years ago: to tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of this world. Let us dedicate ourselves to that, and say a prayer for our country and for our people.“

And here are the words of Mario Savio, that are also food for thought:

Israel Bombs Iran

By Connie Wilson

On June 12, 2025

In Editorial, Essays on Politics: Best Political Essays & Ideology, Local, News, Of Local (Quad Cities') Interest, Politics

horizon during drive

Today is Thursday and I drove from Chicago to the Quad Cities today.

There was extensive road work near Minooka and, again, about 58 miles from the Quad Cities on Interstate 80, but the drive was relatively uneventful.

I left Chicago at 2 p.m. and arrived home at 5:30 p.m., which is exactly the time frame anticipated. We decided to order Chik’ Fil A. In the twenty minutes my husband was gone picking up those sandwiches, it was announced that Israel had launched “preemptive” strikes against Iran. It also was announced that the strikes were the first of a wave of many and that Israeli citizens could expect retaliation.

You can’t convince me—(despite Marco Rubio’s protestations to the contrary)—that the United States didn’t know full well that Benjamin Netanyahu was going to strike Iran, aiming at nuclear facilities and other nuclear-related targets. The U.S. had made some progress in forging a nuclear agreement under John Kerry, but Trump tore up that agreement. Then the Trump administration began attempting to resurrect that dead agreement.

Ironically, there were supposedly talks scheduled for Sunday about limiting Iran’s reach for nuclear weapons. Sounds like those meetings will not be taking place now. Despite the presence of deep-underground Iranian nuclear facilities that will be difficult (if not impossible) to destroy from the air, perhaps there won’t be as much left to “regulate” after Israel unleashes another wave of bombings against its adversarial antagonistic neighbor.

How much DJT really anticipated ever getting such an Iranian arms agreement, with safeguards and inspections, is anybody’s guess. As for me, I suspect that letting Israel bomb Iran right now, when Iran is weakened by the Gaza conflict and Hamas (which is Iran-backed) is in disarray was probably something—much like Ben and Donnie agreeing that they could sure make a nice hotel strip out of the Gaza beach area—the two authoritarian leaders could agree on.

The leader of Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Gen. Hossein Salami, was confirmed dead, Iranian state television reported, a significant blow to Tehran’s governing theocracy and an immediate escalation of its long-simmering conflict with Israel.The chief of staff of Iranian armed forces, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, was also confirmed dead by Iranian state television. Other top military officials and scientists were believed to have been killed. Some 200 Israeli aircraft took part in the operation, hitting about 100 targets, Israeli army chief spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said. Over 100 drones were launched by Iran towards Israel, which the country was intercepting and warning the country’s occupants to remain vigilant. Schools and businesses were closed and other attacks were anticipated.

So, accept the United States’ denial that we had anything to do with the attacks on Iran if you want, but realize that our close relationship with Israel, intensified by the chummy friendship between Netanyahu and Trump—means that at least tacit approval of such a bombing occurred. It would be right in line with DJT’s usual ham-handed approach to diplomacy and everything else (*Cases in point: the removal of immigrants from the U.S. and/or the separation of infants from their mothers at the border during Trump 1.0). This complicit silent approval of the bombing of Iran by Israel goes right along with the chainsaw-wielding He-Man persona Trump wants to project, [while babbling incoherently and (probably) wearing adult diapers.]

Armed troops sent in by Mayor Daley during the Chicago riots of 1968, following the assassination of Martin Luther King.

One other late-breaking news flash: Trump has been ordered to return the National Guard to the command of the Governor of California, who did not ask for the guard to be sent in in the first place. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, an appointee of former President Clinton, temporarily blocked the president from deploying thousands of guardsmen to Los Angeles. The judge said Trump had exceeded his authority (you think?). An appeal was filed immediately and the case will probably go to the Supreme Court.