Welcome to WeeklyWilson.com, where author/film critic Connie (Corcoran) Wilson avoids totally losing her marbles in semi-retirement by writing about film (see the Chicago Film Festival reviews and SXSW), politics and books----her own books and those of other people. You'll also find her diverging frequently to share humorous (or not-so-humorous) anecdotes and concerns. Try it! You'll like it!

Month: December 2010

Elizabeth Edwards Near Death

Elizabeth Edwards Stops at Davenport Democratic Headquarters in Poorly-Planned Last-Minute Campaign Stop

(*This article originally ran on www.blogforiowa.com in 2004, when I covered that presidential election for that blog. I am reprinting it at this time because news reports have said that Elizabeth Edwards is near death from terminal liver cancer. To see a newer take on my memories, go to www.AssociatedContent.com and read what I have written about my own father’s death from liver cancer, coupled with memories of this campaign stop in Davenport, Iowa, the day before the 2004 Presidential election. The day after that election, the couple announced that Elizabeth Edwards was suffering from breast cancer and, of course, we all know “the rest of the story.”

R.I.P., Elizabeth.

By Connie Wilson

The last stop.

Elizabeth Edwards is to “rally” the volunteers in Davenport at Democratic headquarters at 1416 West 16th Street in Davenport the night before the most important election of my lifetime. Tempers are short. Nerves are frayed. Tension is high. These sentiments are probably shared by the candidates and their families. Lots of out-of-towners are here to work on election day, which is only hours away now. 

The “invitation” from Kerry headquarters in Des Moines to this event said, “Elizabeth Edwards will thank volunteers for building a surge of momentum for Kerry leading to Election Day.” I had visions of cup-cakes, pizza and beverages for hard-working volunteers. Guess again.

 I knew that the Democratic headquarters in Davenport was nearly unfindable. It has to be possibly the worst location for a Democratic headquarters in the nation. The Chicago volunteer I talked to on the phone, as I sought directions, agreed with me. I lived in Davenport for a year, and I could not find it, from Locust Street, during two previous daylight excursions. The Chicago native on the phone did tell me one thing that helped: “It’s an old school.”  Usually, when you call the place, trying to get directions, you get an answering machine that is full. Why? The Chicago volunteer said, “I don’t even know how you got through.” Me, either.

I remember the very accessible Howard Dean headquarters across from the Kahl Building fondly after seeing this place. And even the first Kerry headquarters, next to Major Art & Hobby was, at least, findable…. although not very large.

Twice before, I had tried to find the Democratic headquarters at 1416 West 16th Street. Not easy. Tonight, Monday, November 1, 2004, it is dark, rainy and cold. As the Red Baron (in the Snoopy comic strip) would say, “It was a dark and stormy night.”

Still, I felt I should set off on my last adventure. I had high hopes that Elizabeth Edwards would sign the front-page photo of the daughter from the Sunday, October 24th, Moline, Daily Dispatch. I especially hoped this, inasmuch as a Daily Dispatch reader from Geneseo had written a Letter to the Editor that appeared in Sunday, October 31’s paper, attacking all the students in the article, calling them all “dumb.”

I had dragged two copies of the front-page story to the last John Edwards rally at North High School in Davenport. Someone named Lisa, a Connecticut native here working for Kerry, offered to take the newspapers and try to see if she could get one of them autographed for my daughter and returned to me. I only had three. I gave her two. The papers disappeared, never to be seen again. Now I am down to one, which I have brought.

Tonight, as I arrive at the old schoolhouse and park a block and a half-away, walking towards the old school on the hill in a light downpour, it is obvious that having any opportunity to meet or greet Elizabeth Edwards is not going to be easy. The school does not lend itself to any sort of large group gathering. It is a long narrow corridor with small rooms off the corridor. (Think Catholic schools of old….rabbit warren….maze).

 Although, at one point, I caught a glimpse of Elizabeth Edwards, the Secret Service and local police are keeping everyone at bay. It does not appear that it is that “crowded,” but there are no risers, no room in which to gather. As a site for something like this, the place is, quite simply, a disaster. (“It was a dark and rainy night.”)

I did not bring my Press Pass credentials. I did not think this was a “formal” Press opportunity. I was wrong. The Channel 4, 6, and 8 people are taken back, separately, one at a time, as are a couple of print people.

I ask “Matt,” the advance man, if I can take ONE photo of Mrs. Edwards, for www.blogforiowa.com. He nervously ignores me, not even bothering to answer, busily taking a variety of other reporter types through the hallway, past me.

I ask again. And again. I have seen this guy at the last three to four rallies.  I know him on sight, now, as he does me. Perhaps he views me as a pest, at this point. I am not “important” enough. I am sure that Mrs. Edwards is “busy,” but I am also sure that this sort of treatment is what one would expect of the Republicans, not the Democrats. It is intrinsically unfair and “elitist,” and, also, out of touch with the times, since “blogs” are the wave of the future, according to a recent “New York Times” Sunday article.

My advanced degrees are in journalism and English. I have written for five papers over the span of 49 years. Why or how am I “less important” or “less skilled” than those being given access, while I am being told to “keep the aisle clear” and “make sure that this door closes”?

The obvious answer is “readership” or circulation, but, in some ways, OUR readership, at this point in time, is more important, as we are the Democratic “loyalists” that have helped bring this campaign this far, as Paul Eiger so eloquently put it in an e-mail I recently received. We may have started out in Howard Dean’s camp, (and we still believe in Howard Dean), but we have swallowed our pride and worked hard to help this ticket. None of that matters this night. (*Note: the less obvious answer was that Elizabeth Edwards was a very sick woman and had just found that out.)

Finally, desperately, I take pictures of the other people with me  who are standing in the hall without a prayer of laying eyes on Elizabeth Edwards, let alone being “thanked” or “greeted.” (“All of you keep this aisle open. Everyone away from the door. One line, only, please. Make sure that we can open that door.”).  I feel like I’m back at the Cheney rally on Saturday night, when they wouldn’t let us leave the building!

One of these no-luck individuals (pictured) is Samantha Pieczynski, of Davenport. I tell Samantha that I am going to label her smiling photo  as “Mrs. Edwards.” We laugh.

The other gentleman, Norm Bower by name, also of Davenport, asks if I want a quote. “Sure,” I say. His quote: “It is of paramount importance that George W. Bush not be re-elected so that he not be allowed to appoint Justices to the Supreme Court of the Land.” Good quote, Norm.

A young woman in corn rows (obviously an out-of-towner working for the campaign) passes, acting like she feels she is very important (they often do). I ask her if I can get a picture of Mrs. Edwards now. (All other press people have pretty much had their shot …pun intended…, so it would seem that perhaps, now, it is “my turn.” But no 

The oh-so-important volunteer says, airily, “Oh, she’s already left the building.” As soon as this campaign worker descends the staircase and is out of hearing range, the young man next to me says, “She’s not out of the building .She’s RIGHT THERE!” And he gestures towards a classroom or cubbyhole less than 10 feet from where we are all mashed against “the door that must be able to be opened and closed.” In other words, we have just been told an outright lie.

I finally see the writing on the wall. We are never going to get so much as a look at Elizabeth Edwards. We can all forget about the sentiment where it said, “Elizabeth Edwards will rally volunteers .. thank local supporters…Mrs. Edwards will greet local volunteers and speak about the importance of getting out the vote on Election Day.” (Ha!)

None of this is Elizabeth Edward’s fault, of course, but this is the least-well-planned event on the campaign trail, so far. As I leave, I see the corn-rowed worker, and I say, sarcastically, “Thanks for all your help.” She looks at me, puzzled. I add, “I didn’t think that the Democrats would take up where the Republicans left off , blatantly lying to us, quite so quickly.” She scurries for cover. I am angry.

Matt sees this. I have not been treated this poorly at any time during the past 9 months. Matt says, “Why don’t you go see Lisa?” He sees that I am mad enough to tear up, which I am.

Lisa is, apparently, the “smoother-over” person. At this point, I haven’t put a face with the name. It doesn’t really work, Matt. I am still pissed. I gave up my college teaching job to work long and hard as a volunteer for 9 months, only to be shoved aside as “not important enough” for ONE photo. And I have been lied to, both in the same night. I have already voted for Kerry/Edwards, but the “driving to the polls” duties I signed up for, months ago, seem like adding insult to injury, right about now.

Naively, I think that Lisa might be someone who can still assist me in getting  a picture of Mrs. Edwards. Or, maybe Lisa has one on HER digital  camera that she can send me?  Possibly she can help me get that elusive Edwards autograph, an autograph of the front-page picture of the daughter holding the “Hot Chicks Dig Edwards” button. I already lost two copies of these papers at the LAST Edwards appearance (North High School) when I gave it to a campaign worker

. When I find Lisa, I realize that SHE is the woman I gave the two Dispatch front pages to at Davenport North High School, who was “going to try to get it to the candidate”.  Obviously, that didn’t happen; so much for THAT plan!

I have also brought my book Both Sides Now, as a gift, for Elizabeth Edwards. I leave it with Lisa.  I might as well. It is obvious that I am never going to get within 100 yards of the woman. She is probably already speeding down the highway. This entire “event” has been so poorly-organized, planned in a poor location, and, as far as I am concerned, conducted very unfairly. I see a Happy Joe’s. I think, “Ice cream. That’s what I need. Ice cream.”
People like Linda Thieman (who has been working hard, 24/7, for 9 months, without a day off, 90 hou

rs a week, free and gratis, to put this blog together and keep it updated) and me, for that matter….who gave up her fall semester of college teaching to pursue the campaign with a vengeance (both of us on our own dime)…matter as much as Channel 4, 6, 8 or the “regular” newspaper(s). Have these people not read the articles (New York Times, most recently) that trumpet that “blogs” are the newspapers of the future? Are we not getting like 200,000 “hits” a month. Are we not telling it like it is, when mainstream media often has not? Is Iowa not an important “swing” state? I think we all know the answers to these questions.

But, Linda, tonight, www.blogforiowa.com is treated as a second-class citizen. As am I. And I am  upset about it.

Tonight, rather than being “thanked” or “rallied,” I leave almost in tears, feeling very, very disappointed in the entire evening. I am just glad that I didn’t make my daughter leave her homework to seek the long-sought-after elusive autograph of any member of the Edwards family on the front-page photo. Maybe I can get the cute kids, Jack or Mary Claire, (I think her name is)…the smallest Edwards children….to scribble something on this paper. You think? [Not likely, either, I’m thinking].

My entire evening is ruined. All the good vibe(s) of the previous ten rallies or so are crashing and burning..  I am NOT a happy camper. I probably feel about like Ralph Nader did when his poster fell down as he was speaking, in Ames. Disappointed. Dejected. Sad. Unfairly put upon.  It is good that, quoting the refrain in “Apocalypse Now,” “this is the end.”

It sure is.

Book Signings Coming in December

Ava (Wilson) and I sign books on October 30th at Barnes & Noble in Davenport's Northpark Mall.

After over 6 years of hard work, 3 publishers, and many other aggravations, my new nonfiction book It Came from the ’70s: From The Godfather to Apocalypse Now is nearly ready. Advanced reader copies have arrived and only Quad City residents will have the opportunity to see the book “up close and personal” at a benefit for the Midwest Writing Center to be held at Barnes & Noble bookstore in Northpark Mall on Saturday, December 4th, 2010, from 1:30 p.m. until whenever everyone else has left. I am arriving late, due to an appearance at the East Moline Public Library that will start at Noon and end about 1:00 p.m….just when the other E.M. authors are arriving. It is always thus.

I’ll be there with copies of my new movie book of 50 reviews written for the Quad City Times between 1970 and 1979, with 76 photos, major cast and trivia.  The book is not self-published, but put out by a small independent publisher in Rhode Island (“The Merry Blacksmith) and you can see  it on Amazon.com with a “peek inside” feature there.

It’s really a sweet book, if I do say so myself (and I do) and, after the appearances at the library and bookstore, I’m going to be traveling with the book to a Family Video store near you.

First appearance will be on Friday, December 10th, from 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. I’ll be there signing books and, if you buy one, your name, address, phone number and e-mail will be entered into a drawing for $50 of free movie passes at the local theater of your state (Rave or Escape). The drawing for the winner(s) (one per state) will not take place until just before the Academy Awards (Feb. 27).

Why such a long delay? Because I hope to visit still more Family Video stores after we return from Florida, which will be for 2 weeks in February, before the Oscars.

Other appearances between now and Christmas that will earn you a spot (one entry per book purchase) for the free ticket drawing will be held on Saturday, December 11th, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the Family Video store in Moline (12th Avenue) and Saturday, December 18th, from 1 to 4 p.m. at the Family Video store on North Division in Davenport, Iowa. I have been assured that the video stores, themselves, may have some “specials” for you, as well. So, come on out and get an autographed copy of this unique book for that movie buff in your family.

The book is not (yet) available as an e-book. We’re working on it, but it will not have as many pictures as an e-book, so this is the book you want. Again, take a look at the “peek inside” feature on Amazon.com and you can see, for yourself, the quality of the contents, including about half new articleson movies like “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,” “The Godfather” (1 and 2), the films of Woody Allen, etc. There were so many great films in the ’70s that I can’t begin to list them all here, but the Table of Contents on Amazon will give you an idea.

I will have my other books with me…everything from “Hellfire & Damnation’ (www.HellfireandDamnationtheBook.com) to the three-book trilogy of ghost stories set along Route 66 (www.GhostlyTalesofRoute66.com).

But you can only get the book signed at one of the events listed above, and it is nominated, right now, for 3 awards (to be awarded in late May.)

“Love & Other Drugs” Review

The new Edward Zwick (“Thirty Something,” “My So-Called Life”) film “Love and Other Drugs” is based on a novel entitled Hard Sell: The Evolution of a Viagra Salesman by Jamie Reidy. That, alone, should tell you that you’re in for a polemic on the world of pharmaceutical sales.

It is also a love story about a 26-year-old Parkinson’s patient in 1996 (Anne Hathaway as Maggie Murdoch) who is screwing her way through stage one of the disease. I say “screwing her way through” because one of the things this movie will be most remembered for are the many and numerous sex scenes. They are plentiful. For the most part, they are quite good, although the first scene in Maggie Murdoch’s (Anne Hathaway’s) apartment is, as Entertainment Weekly phrased it “particularly carnal.” (“Naked Truths” by Dave Karger, November 26, 2010).

Anne Hathaway was just announced as the co-host with James Franco of this year’s Academy Awards. I wonder if there will be jokes aimed at her boinking the living bejesus out of co-star Jake Gyllenhaal—lately rumored to be getting it on with the much-younger Taylor Swift (Gyllenhaal will turn 30 on December 19th, while Swift will turn 21 on December 13th).

The first thing I noticed about the film was Jill Clayburgh, playing Jamie Randall’s (Jake Gyllenhaal’s) mother. Clayburgh was voted one of the 25 best actresses in Hollywood by Entertainment Weekly in 1999 and remained a beautiful woman until the day she died at age 66 on November 5th of this year. “Love and Other Drugs” is not her last movie (that distinction goes to the still-in-production “Bridesmaids”) but I remember thinking how great it was to see her onscreen after such a long time. And how sad I feel knowing that she is gone, never to light up a movie screen with her intelligence and her beauty again.

But times have changed. And how!

Now we have the gorgeous Jake Gyllenhaal and the less-gorgeous Anne Hathaway screwing like mink onscreen every chance they get. Because, you see, the heroine is ill (with Parkinson’s disease) and brittle and fragile and extremely cranky and controlling.  Hathaway is quoted in the Entertainment Weekly piece mentioned above this way: “So, for me, this role was pretty out-there in terms of the way I usually am in public concerning my body.  So, I thought, ‘Okay, I’m going to be in control.  I’m going to do everything properly, disrobe at the last minute, and in between shots get the clothes back on.’ But then I found that every time I put my robe back on, it rubbed all the body makeup off, and that added 20 minutes to filming.  As with all things in life, the second you stop making it about you and you make it about everyone else, it just got, dare I say, fun.” I got kind of tired of her cranky, cynical act and wanted to smack her a few times, but I’m sure that’s just me.

Jamie is the bright ne’er-do-well son of a doctor (George Segal) and his wife (Jill Clayburgh) and his overweight, unattractive brother Josh (comparisons to Jonah Hill abound) is a dot.com millionaire…although his wife has just thrown him out of the house, for reasons we never quite understand or learn. Mostly, we don’t understand why someone worth $35 million finds it necessary to impose on his handsome bachelor brother for long periods of time—except that, otherwise, all the opportunities for loutish “Hangover” style humor would be missed. When he moves in with Jamie, Josh (Josh Gad), the unattractive brother, says, “If you could make money f******, you’d be even richer than me.” Probably true.

The smart part of the movie is the part denouncing pharmaceutical firms like Pfizer (which is featured prominently, by name, at all points, so go figure) with lines like, “They’re turning complex medical decisions into commercialism.” Oliver Platt, who plays Jamie’s boss in pharmaceutical sales notes, “They’re even starting to hire strippers.” Platt has decided that the good-looking Jamie is his ticket to ride back home to Chicago, the Promised Land, from Pittsburgh. (“I’ve got an idea that you and your swinging dick might be my ticket to the Big Leagues.”)

The “meet cute” portion of this love story is handled in cynical fashion, as the two meet in a coffee shop and the extremely brittle Ms. Murdoch (Hathaway) says, “This is about finding an hour or two of relief from the pain of being you.” She admits she wants the same thing. So, the two, not unlike Woody Allen and Diane Keaton in “Annie Hall,” …who merely kiss to “get it out of the way” in innocent 70’s style…go to Maggie’s apartment and have at it. Watching this sex scene was like watching an episode of “Wild Kingdom.”

Gyllenhaal, when asked about this particular first love scene, admitted that, in love scenes, “I’ve always felt, particularly with women, it’s good to have a dance, like choreography.  ‘I’m going to turn you here, then that’s going to happen…We were like, fake having sex and being like, ‘Knock the pot off, knock the pot off.’ I was not focusing on her at all and instead focusing on knocking the f***** pot off for Ed (Zwick, the director).” [It should be noted for the record here that Gyllenhaal played Heath Ledger’s gay lover in “Brokeback Mountain,” where Hathaway was his wife, so he has some experience in love scenes with both genders.]

The pot was definitely knocked off in the carnal kitchen love scene.

When Viagra hits the market in 1996, Jamie begs his boss (Oliver Platt) for the chance to sell it, saying, “Who can sell a dick drug better than me?” He has a point. Jamie takes on his arch-nemesis, Trey Hannigan (Gabriel Macht), an ex-Marine who was once Maggie’s very-married lover. He is always trying to best him at getting key doctors to prescribe Prozac rather than Zoloft.  Now, he will beat him with a dick drug. The Trey Hannigan subplot started and then died aborning, with no real resolution as to exactly what happened when, why or where. Just another lost thread or another lost opportunity. There are many threads…too many, really, for one movie to adequately follow.

Another reviewer (Trisha Leigh) warned her readers not to see it with their parents. (Trisha Leigh on www.Poptimal) I went with my daughter (age 23) and I liked the film better than she did, so what does that say about us? Not sure. Pretty sure it means I’m not a prude about hot sex scenes. I know this to be true, because, one summer vacation, my college roommate and I rented every hot sex scene we could think of and watched them all, rating them from “1” to “10.”(Another article, perhaps?)

The sex scenes in this film are superb. The drug rant: likewise timely. The obnoxious Jonah-Hill-like brother: not as well-received. The sentimental love story? I’ll let you decide where you stand, judging some actual lines from the film:

Oliver Platt to Jake Gyllenhaal, on using Jamie Randall’s sales and bedroom prowess to earn his way back to Chicago (“the Big Leagues”):  “It takes a talented eye to spot talent in a colossal f***-up such as yourself.”

Jake Gyllenhaal, to Anne Hathaway:  “You’ve got to understand that you’re still there…still yourself.  And life is beautiful.” (Maybe a little too Pollyanna-ish?)

Anne Hathaway, to Jake Gyllenhaal, discussing her Stage One Parkinson’s disease:  “It’s not a disease.  It’s a Russian novel.”  Later, she tells Jamie, “This is the first time in my life that I’ve never not felt alone.  That someone is there.” (Bi-polar mood swings? I think there’s a drug for that.)

Anne Hathaway to Jake Gyllenhaal:  “Apparently, you need to know I’m going to get better in order to love me…Nobody wants to be the one who runs away.”

Maggie Murdoch (Anne Hathaway) on the sex tape the two lovers make, when she’s in one of her rare non-brittle, non-cynical moods:  “It doesn’t matter if I have 10,000 more moments or just this one, because I have this one.” (OK. Pollyanna rules.)

Anne Hathaway:  “I have never known anyone who actually believed I was enough.  Until I met you.” (Awwwwww).

Or there’s this line:  “Sometimes the thing you most want doesn’t happen. And then you meet one person and your life is changed forever.” (Jack the Ripper comes to mind.)

Now that I’ve given you the treacly stuff (Line: “What is this? An episode of ‘General Hospital’?”), here are the good things about the movie and the bad things about the film:

GOOD:

Acting: good.

Sex scenes: good.

Ranting against pharmaceutical companies: good.

Old guy warning Jake that, if he had to do it over again, he wouldn’t marry the wife he loves: good.

BAD:

Younger brother in film: bad. Wrong movie for this.

Logic in many spots and in general: bad. (What does this Maggie person do for a living? All we ever see her do is sit around trying to control scissors so she can do something artistic in her bohemian apartment? Where does she keep coming up with these phenomenal boyfriends? [Please share that information with all the single girls in Pittsburgh/Ohio/Chicago; they want to know.])

Constant bitchiness of the female lead: bad. Maggie has good cause to be bitter, but the line Ms. Hathaway gave about being “in control” in the Entertainment Weekly interview certainly came through in her really cynical, mean girl performance. She is afraid that she will be a burden, so she wants to live in the moment and enjoy all the sex she can for now, because tomorrow is on the horizon and who knows what tomorrow will bring? We get it.

Ms. Hathaway:  I may be the only theater-goer in America that does not find Ms Hathaway that appealing physically. The over-large mouth (a la Julia Roberts), the anorexic frame, the big brown eyes. Dare I say that she reminds me of a preying mantis, when apparently every “boob man” in Reviewland has remarked on her complete baring of her breasts (and almost everything else.) (Her breasts are small; it ain’t no big thing, as was muttered in another film with sex scenes.)

Jake Gylenhaal also gives it up and does near-total nudity for his art, but not to the extent of Kevin Bacon in “Wild Things” or Richard Gere in “Breathless.” While it was great admiring his toned body, there were a few bits that the film hedged on and kept covered. Let’s have the Full Monty if we’re going to go to these lengths for this many sex scenes, in the future.

Therefore, the advice about going with your parental unit, while cute and relevant if you’re very young, was unnecessary. There have been films with a lot “hotter” love scenes than this film, (and, if you want a list, I’ll write one up for you.
There just haven’t been many films that had this many love scenes that co-opted the entire film and almost ruined the message for young lovers and pharmaceutical companies.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén